I went to a crisis for the psychotherapist during a session

I went to a crisis for the psychotherapist during a session

The I went into one of the most difficult crises in my career as a psychologist. This old Chinese oracle can reflect the wisdom of the unconscious or the higher itself. It helped me to solve problems, make decisions and even literally save my life. But the promotions that I have acquired in psychology and social work were carried out from very different professional premises.

After I had left the I as a spiritual leader for many years, I started to integrate the method into psychotherapy sessions. It is a valuable tool that enables customers (which may learn the method itself), and it offers an objective perspective that often reveals the hidden problems of the unconscious. I was a youngian-oriented psychotherapist and Jung himself had rely on the I went for decades. He even wrote the introduction to the translation of Wilhelm and Baynes.

This made sense and had worked perfectly for years until one day I could see in an extremely difficult case that the I went that the client read during a therapy session, that was wrong . And that was not easy wrong, but totally and terrible, wrong. As if you were told a little child that the divorce of the parents is really was her fault.

The I was directly contradicted my professional judgment as a psychologist. That threw me into a spiritual crisis of faith and a specialist conflict in real time during this session.

The client in question was caught when she denied her father's harmful nature. (He was less Care as Attila of the Hunne.) She had created an adaptive deception of his paternity, which had helped her survive childhood, but had caught up as an adult and finally had to get out.

Any attempt to discuss the negative story of the father triggered a violent defense of her "rosy" deception. "He wasn't as bad as people say" had counted any criticism for decades. It blocked a reality that was too painful for the child, but was necessary for the adult. Perhaps, since she was familiar with the I, she could have a reading during her session, offer an objective view that she could take to heart.

The client was looking forward to this feedback and I too - until I saw the answer, it was my job to read her. She had asked: "How should I see my father?" She threw the coins and published the hexagram of "The Family", which made sense, but there were only positive comments that described and praised the behavior of the head of the family! (Oh my god)

Psychological that was absolutely wrong. This view could nourish its resistance to the truth and continue to consolidate. Should I prefer psychology to spirituality and cancel reading because I didn't like the result? How could I take this reading responsibly in your meeting if this could further confirm your weakening delusions of Papa? Should I use this powerful young tool in therapy even if I don't have the answers under control?

At the moment I decided to end what I had started and read out loudly - with great distress and excitement - as too much "leads to regrets against your own flesh and blood", but it is better as well as little discipline. This seemed to justify the father! The lines 5 and 6 were worse! I read in painful things like:

The customers delusional system was defended against all of the father's criticism ... but nobody had ever praised him; Why defend it? Resistance is often directed in one direction. "Sometimes you initiate real changes by continuing things in the wrong direction to unlock this resistance," once told me a wiser shaman. What a brilliant use of this "reverse psychology" went through the I. I can assure you that some of my problems have doubts in the support of the customer.