Study: Metformin protects against breast cancer metastases

Reference El-Haggar SM, El-Shitany Na, Mostafa MF, El-Bassiouny Na. Metformin can protect women with non -diabetic breast cancer from metastasis. Clin Exp metastasis. 2016; 33 (4): 339-357. Objective The effects of adding metformin on adjuvant breast cancer therapy in women without diabetes should be examined. According to the exclusion of the exclusion criteria, a total of 129 non-diabetic women were randomized in 2 main groups-a control group (n = 61) that only received adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy treatment) [CT] and hormone therapy [HT]) and a metformin group (n ...
(Symbolbild/natur.wiki)

Study: Metformin protects against breast cancer metastases

Reference

el-Haggar SM, el-shitany Na, Mostafa MF, el-bassiouny na. Metformin can protect women with non -diabetic breast cancer from metastasis. Clin Exp metastasis . 2016; 33 (4): 339-357.

objective

The effects of adding metformin to adjuvant breast cancer therapy in women should be examined without diabetes

study design and participant

Women aged 40 to 65 from the Damanhour Oncology Center (Damanhour, Egypt) with newly diagnosed breast cancer were one of the participants. According to the application of the exclusion criteria, a total of 129 non-diabetic women were randomized in 2 main groups-a control group (n = 61) that only received adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy treatment) [CT] and hormone therapy [HT]) and a metformin group (n = 68) that received adjuvant therapy plus metformin therapy. After the initial CT, women received tamoxifen in the control group with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, while women in the metformin group with ER-positive breast cancer were given both tamoxifen and metformin. Women with era-negative breast cancer both in the control and metforming group were only treated with CT. A total of 102 women ended the 12-month treatment scheme, with the same number (n = 51) in each group. In the control group, 43 er-positive women received tamoxifen and 8 (negative) only received CT; In the metformin group, 42 er-positive women received tamoxifen plus metformin and 9 (erz-negative) women in addition to the first CT round only metformin.

medication and dosage study

The women in the metformin group received 850 mg metformin twice a day. All women were treated with adjuvant therapy in accordance with the protocols of the Ministry of Health and Population and the National Cancer Institute, Egypt. Women received either 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (fac scheme) or Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and taxol (AC-T-scheme). The majority of women received FAC (51 in the control group and 58 in the metforming group). Both the metformin group and the control group received intramuscular vitamin B12 every 3 days to avoid the occurrence of a vitamin B12 deficiency that could occur with long-term use of metformin.

target parameter

blood samples were started at the start of the study, after chemotherapy (CT), after 6 months of hormone therapy (6-HT) and after 12 months of hormone therapy (12-HT) for analyzing the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF- 1), IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), insulin, sober-blood sugar (fbg) IGF-1 to IGFBP-3, homeostatic model evaluation of insulin resistance (Homa-IR) and cancer antigen (approx.) 15-3 (metastasis marker). The assessment of the metastasis was documented clinically and radiologically.

important knowledge

metformin led to a significant reduction in the molitator of IGF-1, IGF-1: IGFBP-3, Insulin, FBG and Homa-IR and to a significant increase in IGFBP-3, the most important IGF transport protein in the blood. (High IGFBP-3 levels in tumors are associated with an increased cancer heavy [or worse outcome] for some types of cancer but reduced severity or better result for others.)
This current study is remarkable because the patients have no diabetes, which indicates that diabetes and increased blood sugar are no prerequisites for metformin to be effective cancer treatment.
The application of metformin was significantly associated with the decrease in metastatic events after 6-month tamoxifen gift compared to the control group.
The er-positive women who received metformin showed a significant acceptance ( p = 0.042) in metastatic events after 6 months compared to er-positive controls (no metastatic events in the metforming group compared to 9.3 % in the control group). After 12 months, Metformin showed a non-significant reduction ( p = 0.144) of metastatic events in er-positive women compared to er-positive controls (9.5 % metastatic events in the metforming group compared to 20.9 % in the control group).
In era-negative women, Metformin led to a non-significant reduction ( p = 0.453) of metastatic events after 6 months compared to the era negative controls (11.1 % metastatic events in the metformin group vs. 25 % in the control group). Metformin also showed a non-significant reduction ( p = 0.232) of metastatic events after 12 months in era negative women compared to era negative controls (22.5 % metastatic events in the metforming group compared to 50 % in the control group).

practice implications

The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential chemofeating effects of adding metformin to adjuvant breast cancer therapy in women without diabetes. The results indicate that the addition of metformin for adjuvant therapy has antitumor and anti-timetatic effects, which was shown either by reducing the incidence of metastases or in an extension of the duration to metastasis. The antitumoral and anti-timetatic effects of metformin can be attributed to other effects of metformin itself or on its probable effect on the reduction of the mitomarks IGF-1, IGF1: IGFBP-3, Insulin, FBG, Homa-IR-Index and the Insulin resistance IGFBP-3.
In view of what is now known about the anti -cancer advantages of metformin, 1 These results are hardly a surprise. This study illustrates a basic principle of naturopathic oncology, which is not given little attention in standard oncology. This means that instead of waiting for whether a recurrence develops after chemotherapy, we use relatively non -toxic means with the aim of extending remission.
There are other publications that show increased benefits when metformin is added to chemotherapy. One of the first to record increased benefits of metformin in chemotherapy was a retrospective study from 2009 with patients with diabetic breast cancer. The rate of complete response was 24 % in the group with metformin additive compared to 8.0 % in the group without metformin ( p = 0.02). 2 This current study is remarkable because the patient has no diabetes, which indicates that diabetes and increased blood sugar are no prerequisite for metformin Cancer treatment.

restrictions

While all trends indicated in this study to use metformin's use, only the ER-positive group achieved statistical significance after 6 months. The small number of participants is given as a possible reason that after 12 months there was no significant difference between the number of metastatic events in the metformin group and the control group.

note of the editorial office

Is Metformin Natural Canteen?

Our practice in the magazine for naturopathy is to emphasize the use of natural and complementary medicines so that our primary readership, naturopathic doctors, remains informed about current research results that influence their clinical practice. The provision of information about the prescription drug metformin can appear as a deviation from this practice. After careful consideration, we decided to review two research work on metformin, since the information is of clinical relevance for many of our patients. Some would argue that metformin is not a natural medicine as a prescription drug. Others would argue that it is a synthetic imitation of chemical galega officinalis , it falls into a less defined category. The prescription of metformin now falls within the area of ​​responsibility of many of our colleagues, so that this distinction may be important. Even for those of us who cannot prescribe metformin, his new potential benefit in the prevention and treatment of cancer is still relevant, since many natural substances and lifestyle practices that we routinely prescribe patients can have similar effects on physiology.
In June 2016 there were almost 2000 articles to which PubMed (according to Mesh terms) was referred to, which refers to metformin and cancer. In this issue, two publications from 2016 will be presented. The mechanisms of action of metformin lead to a list of advantages against cancer, including the blocking of the MTOR signal path, the stimulation of the apoptosis of cancer stem cells, the inhibition of angiogenesis, the oppression of Her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, a protein that is sometimes associated with breast cancer), the increase in the advantage of more Chemotherapy and improvement in the killing of radiation cells. There are indications that Berberin can cause some of these effects, and while this idea creates great enthusiasm among our colleagues in relation to the use of Berber in similar situations, there are far more published evidence of metformin. There is no recognizable structural similarity between metformin and berberin molecules and the two substances do not always create the same effects. Although some speak of Berber as a botanical replacement for metformin, one should be careful with such assumptions, especially when it has been shown that metformin causes something that has not yet been shown for Berber.
Jakob Schor
editor, abstracts & comment
Journal of Naturopathy

  1. daugan M, Dufaÿ Wojcicki a, d’Hayer B, Boudy V. Metformin: An antidiabetic for cancer control. pharmacol. Res . 2016; 113 (part a): 675-685.
  2. Jiralerspong S, Palla SL, Giordano Sh, et al. Metformin and pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in diabetic patients with breast cancer. j clin oncol . 2009; 27 (20): 3297-3302.