Globules against cyclical disorders: study shows limited effect

In einer Studie mit 92 Frauen zeigten homöopathische Mittel bei Menstruationsstörungen keinen signifikanten Vorteil gegenüber Placebos, außer bei Verhaltensänderungen. Weitere Forschung ist nötig.
In a study with 92 women, homeopathic remedies in menstrual disorders showed no significant advantage over placebos, except for changes in behavior. Further research is necessary. (Symbolbild/natur.wiki)

Globules against cyclical disorders: study shows limited effect

Research examined whether homeopathic remedies (so -called Erws) are more effective in women with an irregular menstrual cycle than placebos. A placebo is a false medication that does not contain any active ingredients. The study was carried out as a double blind attempt, which means that neither the participants nor the researchers knew who received homeopathic remedies and who received the placebo in order not to influence the results.

In the study, 92 women were randomly divided into two groups: one group received the homeopathic remedies together with the usual care, the other group received a placebo along with the same care. The main focus was on whether the irregular menstrual cycle can be regulated over three successive cycles. Another aspect was the detection of other symptoms using a special questionnaire (menstrual distribution questionnaire - MDQ), which measures the well -being of women during their period.

The results were analyzed after four months. It turned out that there was hardly any difference between the homeopathy group and the placebo group in relation to the regular menstrual cycle. The homeopathy group showed improvements in the other symptoms that were assessed by the questionnaire in some areas, but these were generally not statistically significant, with the exception of a category that concerned behavioral changes Interestingly, research did not lead to damage or serious side effects among the participants, regardless of whether they took homeopathic remedies or placebos.

summarized in this special investigation could not be demonstrated that homeopathic remedies are more effective in menstrual disregards than placebos. Other methods or measuring instruments could be used for the future to achieve different or more precise results.

Basic terms and concepts

  • homeopathy: an alternative healing method that is based on the principle that "similar things can be healed by similar things".
  • placebo: A fake drug without pharmacologically effective substances that are used in clinical studies to control the results.
  • double -blind study: a study design in which neither the participants nor the researchers know who receives which preparation in order not to create any biased results.
  • menstrual distribution Questionnaire (MDQ): A questionnaire that was developed to evaluate psychological and physical symptoms during menstruation.
  • Intention-to-Treat Analysis: A analytical method in which all subjects are analyzed in the original group, even if they do not complete the treatment.

abbreviations

  • Erps: Individual homeopathic remedies (Individualized Homeopathic Medicinal Products)
  • MDQ: menstrual distribution Questionnaire

Homeopathy versus placebo in menstrual disregards: a double -blind, randomized study

The present study examines the effectiveness of individualized homeopathic medicines (Erms) compared to placebos in the treatment of menstrual disregards. Research is based on a double -blind, randomized and placebo -controlled study with two parallel groups. This was carried out on the D. N. de Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital in Kolkata, India. The aim was to assess the effect of homeopathic preparations using three consecutive menstrual cycles.

methodology

The study included 92 women with menstrual, which were divided into two groups: the verum group (46 patients who received them and accompanying care) and the control group (46 patients who received placebo and the same care). The main results were evaluated over a period of four months, with the primary endpoint being corrected by three consecutive cycles.

primary and secondary results

The primary analysis focused on the proportion of women who achieved a correction of menstrual disregard. In addition, the menstrual distress Questionnaire (MDQ) was used to measure secondary results. Chi square tests for categorical data, as well as two-time repeated measurement analyzes of the variance were carried out to evaluate time effect-related interactions.

parameter Verum group (Erps) control group (placebo)
Success rate of correction 22/46 24/46
MDQ overall core improvement statistically not significant Statistisch nicht signifikant
behavior change subscala p = 0.029 p <0.001

conclusions and implications

The study showed no statistically significant difference between the effectiveness of Erpps and Placebos in most results. An exception was the change in behavior of the MDQ, which showed a significant improvement in the Verum Group, but without adding clinical relevance. The most common active ingredient was Lachesis muta , and the most frequently used repertories were Kent’s Repertory and the Zandvoort’s Complete Repertory. No serious side event or damage was reported in one of the two groups.

The researchers concluded that more suitable target parameters are required for future studies in order to prove the effectiveness of HORPSPER more clearly. The complete details of the study can be viewed under the following source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39084625 .