CO2 compensation: meaningful or eyewash?

Veröffentlicht:

Aktualisiert:

Von:

In times when climate protection is becoming increasingly important for humanity, one is increasingly encountered the term "CO2 compensation". CO2 compensation, also known as CO2-offset, is a mechanism through which companies or private individuals can compensate for the CO2 emissions caused by their activities. But does CO2 compensation really make sense, or is it just an eyewipe that a falsely impression of environmental friendliness is created? In the following we will illuminate this topic more precisely. What is CO2 compensation? Definition The CO2 compensation works on the basis of the principle that the global warming is caused by the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, regardless of where in the world ...
(Symbolbild/natur.wiki)

In times when climate protection is becoming increasingly important for humanity, one is increasingly encountered the term "CO2 compensation". CO2 compensation, also known as CO2-offset, is a mechanism through which companies or private individuals can compensate for the CO2 emissions caused by their activities. But does CO2 compensation really make sense, or is it just an eyewipe that a falsely impression of environmental friendliness is created? In the following we will illuminate this topic more precisely.

What is CO2 compensation?

definition

The CO2 compensation works on the basis of the principle that the global warming is caused by the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, regardless of where CO2 was expelled in the world. In this procedure, a company or a private individual pays the emission of a ton of CO2 in a place by saving or breaking down a ton of CO2 in a different location.

functionality

As a rule, this is done by investing in climate protection projects that reduce the amount of CO2, which can be found in the atmosphere, for example, through renewable energy sources or reforestation measures. The amount of CO2 is always compensated for by your own activity. Environmental protection organizations or certified companies offer CO2 equalization certificates.

advantages and disadvantages of CO2 compensation

advantages

CO2 compensation can help to raise awareness of climate-damaging activities and to create incentives to reduce CO2 footprint. Here the main goal is to promote climate protection projects, which would not be feasible without these financial resources. In addition, compensation can also contribute to local economic development and social progress in developing countries, where numerous of these projects take place.

disadvantages

A main point of criticism against CO2 compensation is that you may convey a false feeling of security. By "equalizing" your emissions, one could assume that no further changes to the lifestyle or business practices are necessary. There is also a risk that the compensation serves as an excuse not to act sustainably. Another point of criticism is the difficulty of measuring and checking the actual benefit of compensation projects. It is often not easy to determine whether a project actually saves or absorbs the amount of CO2 that it claims.

Different opinions on CO2 compensation

positive view

Pendants of the CO2 compensation emphasize that it is better to compensate for nothing than to do anything. You see compensation as a "necessary evil" that helps to reduce the CO2 footprint, while social and economic adjustments are made to find more permanent solutions. CO2 compensation can also serve as the starting point for a deeper commitment to climate protection.

negative view

However, critics argue that CO2 compensation is a way out to avoid a really sustainable life and economy. You see this instrument as a kind of "indulgence trade" that enables the causers of emissions to calm their conscience without changing their behavior. In addition, the fear is often expressed that CO2 compensation is simply a kind of "Greenwashing"-an attempt to make a company appear more environmentally friendly than it is actually.

final assessment

Whether the CO2 compensation could be classified as sensible or eyewiping depends heavily on the perspective and the context. It is important to emphasize that CO2 compensation is only a small part of the much larger puzzle that needs to be solved to stop global warming. It should not be seen as a sole solution, but should be a complementary approach to more radical measures such as drastic emission reductions as well as transformation of the energy system and consumption behavior.

Finally, it can be said: CO2 compensation can make sense as an instrument in the fight against climate change-provided it does not replace the consistent and direct climate protection, but complements it. It does not mean that we should stop reducing our own CO2 footprint and avoiding emissions wherever possible. That should continue to be our top priority. However, while we are on the way to a more sustainable life and economy, we could compensate for the emissions that we cannot (yet) avoid. However, we should always keep an eye on the quality and credibility of the supported climate protection projects and make sure that they actually contribute to CO2 reduction.